Constitutional Law and Amparo

MNP Consultores provides a comprehensive legal defense specialized in constitutional law and amparo proceedings, designed to effectively protect the fundamental rights of our clients against illegal or arbitrary acts of the authorities. Our service is characterized by an exhaustive analysis of the constitutional order and a highly specialized procedural strategy, oriented to the prevention and nullification of acts that violate essential principles such as legal certainty, legality and due process. Through precise legal advice and constant accompaniment, we guarantee a solid and personalized defense to safeguard the interests of our clients at all levels of the judicial process.

Our multidisciplinary team is formed by lawyers with postgraduate studies in national and international universities, with extensive experience working in the Federal Court of Administrative Justice, the Federal Judiciary, the Tax Administration Service, the Taxpayer's Defense Attorney's Office, as well as the private sector, which makes us experts in dealing with matters involving the violation of constitutionally regulated fundamental rights.

We have experience serving national and transnational companies in various sectors, such as pharmaceutical, manufacturing, technology, construction, among others, as well as serving various municipal entities in several states of the Republic.

Areas of Expertise

Amparo proceedings: Representation in direct amparo, indirect amparo and amparo against laws, to protect fundamental rights against acts of authority or general rules contrary to the Constitution.
Constitutional Litigation: Unconstitutionality actions, constitutional controversies and defense of human rights, as well as constitutionality studies and preventive strategies.
Complementary Services: Analysis of the constitutionality of regulations and administrative acts, design of preventive strategies and training on fundamental rights for government entities and constitutional defense mechanisms.

Success stories

We were able to release the seizure of a bank account when it was proven that the funds were constituted by unseizable items related to the subsistence of individuals, guaranteeing the immediate restitution of the resources.
A favorable resolution was obtained against the freezing of assets ordered by the Financial Intelligence Unit of an individual who had not been notified of the procedure and was unaware of the reason for the measure. The amparo trial proved that the financial blockade lacked justification, ensuring the restitution of the resources.
A district court granted the protection of federal justice against a precautionary seizure applied as a precautionary measure in tax matters. It was proven that the conduct that motivated the measure had ceased, determining that the continued immobilization of the accounts was disproportionate, and access to the resources was reestablished.
Through the indirect amparo, we were able to demonstrate the proper interpretation of article 57 of the Federal Law of Administrative Litigation Procedure, in the matter of compliance with judgments, due to the improper failure to locate the taxpayer.
In various extraordinary means of defense, we have been successful in demonstrating the unconstitutionality and/or unconstitutionality of various legal provisions, to the benefit of our clients.